Judge protects B.C. Alzheimer’s patient from husband ‘trying to kill her’

Judge protects B.C. Alzheimer’s patient from husband ‘trying to kill her’

B.C. man spoke openly about a ‘death plan’ for his 77-year-old wife if she became ineligible for MAID, over her objections

Author of the article:

By Courtney Greenberg

Published Dec 19, 2025

Last updated 2 days ago

3 minute read

You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.

The care spectrum for older adults is a continuum, which should be seamless as we transition from one level of care to another, including from home support to assisted living to supportive living and sometimes to long-term care, writes Dr. Roger Wong. Getty Images Photo by Drazen Zigic /Getty Images
Article content

A 77-year-old woman with advanced Alzheimer’s has been granted protection “against the likelihood of death at the hands of her husband” by the B.C. Supreme Court.

THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY

Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.

  • Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account.
  • Get exclusive access to the Vancouver Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on.
  • Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists.
  • Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists.
  • Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.
SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES

Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.

  • Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account.
  • Get exclusive access to the Vancouver Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on.
  • Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists.
  • Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists.
  • Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.
REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

  • Access articles from across Canada with one account.
  • Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.
  • Enjoy additional articles per month.
  • Get email updates from your favourite authors.
THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK.

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

  • Access articles from across Canada with one account
  • Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments
  • Enjoy additional articles per month
  • Get email updates from your favourite authors

Sign In or Create an Account

or View more offers

Article content

The case involves a woman, identified in court files as E.W., and her husband, identified as T.W.. T.W. is a strong advocate for medical assistance in dying (MAID) and even spoke openly about a “Death Plan” for his wife, who was diagnosed with Alzheimer’s in 2017, Justice B. Smith wrote in his reasons for judgment.

Article content

We apologize, but this video has failed to load.
Try refreshing your browser, or
tap here to see other videos from our team.
Judge protects B.C. Alzheimer’s patient from husband ‘trying to kill her’ Back to video

We apologize, but this video has failed to load.
Try refreshing your browser, or
tap here to see other videos from our team.
Article content
Article content

The “Death Plan,” as it was described by T.W. to family, friends and health-care workers, was to “end” E.W.’s life if she became ineligible for MAID (which she eventually did) and then “take his own life.”

Article content
Article content

The issue was brought to the Supreme Court after the Vancouver Island Health Authority, a publicly funded health care provider, raised concerns about the well-being of E.W. “E.W. never expressed agreement with the Death Plan. On the contrary, E.W. was understandably upset by it. E.W. expressed to (their daughter) S.T. that T.W. was trying to kill her,” the court document says.

Article content

After E.W.’s diagnosis, health-care providers suggested that she and her husband plan for future care, as her illness was progressing.

Article content

In November 2018, the couple and their daughter, S.T., made a representation agreement — a legal document that authorizes a person to be a substitute decision maker in B.C. law if a person cannot speak for themselves, according to B.C. Centre for Palliative Care.

Article content
Article content

T.W. was selected as E.W.’s authorized representative, and their daughter was an alternative.

Article content
Read More
  1. Advertisement 1
    Story continues below
    This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content

E.W. was deemed eligible for MAID in the summer of 2020, according to the judgment. However, in September 2021, she told one of the doctors who assessed her “that she was not interested in receiving MAID in circumstances related to worsening memory or confusion.”

Article content

In a report from the doctor to Island Health, E.W. was later assessed as ineligible because “she was incapable of providing the requisite consent.”

Article content

The report determined that if “T.W. learned that E.W. was ineligible for MAID, he planned to carry out the Death Plan, which he referred to as a “dignicide.” It also said that at the time, E.W. “expressed that she was not ready to die” and that due to her “cognitive impairment…she was a vulnerable adult at risk of abuse and neglect.”

Article content

Island Health decided to petition for E.W.’s protection.

Advertisement 1
This advertisement has not loaded yet.
Advertisement 2
Advertisement
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content

“Island Health did not believe that E.W. was then being abused or neglected by T.W., but was concerned that E.W. did not perceive herself as having any cognitive or functional limitations and therefore was unable to take care of herself in relation to the Death Plan,” wrote Smith in the judgment.

Article content

During wellness checks, T.W. told nurses about plans he was actively involved in to prepare for both his and his wife’s deaths. This included “paying for funeral services and grave sites, selling assets and distributing the proceeds, preparing obituaries and creating memorabilia as part of their collective legacy.”

Article content

In 2022, Island Health exercised its emergency powers to move E.W. from their home to a nearby hospital, as specialists said her condition was worsening. She remains in a facility.

Article content

In court documents, T.W. was described as “dominating” discussions about end-of-life planning. The couple’s daughter spoke to her mother alone to determine what she wanted. E.W. told her daughter that “if she ever became highly dependent on others, she wished to go into long-term care, as she would ‘not want to burden family with her care.’”

Article content
Article content

In the Dec. 17 document, the court ordered that the couple’s daughter replace her father as E.W.’s personal representative. T.W. was found to be unsuitable.

Article content

Critics of MAID have pointed to how it can affect vulnerable people. Commenting on a post about the case on X, British Columbia Aboriginal Network on Disability Society wrote: “Pretty sure this is what they told all of us…They caught this case, but how many other ‘dignicide’ (that’s apparently a new slang for murder) cases did they miss.”

Article content

Advocates say it allows eligible people the option to die with dignity on their own terms.

Article content

Parliament passed federal legislation allowing eligible adults in Canada to request MAID in June 2016.

Article content

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.

Article content
Share this article in your social network

More From Vancouver Chronicles