Surrey’s mayor wants to withdraw his city from Metro Vancouver. How much will taxpayers really save?

Surrey’s mayor wants to withdraw his city from Metro Vancouver. How much will taxpayers really save?

Doug McCallum made the promise during his bid for mayor, saying the city will only remain for water, sewer and waste services

Author of the article:

By Sobia Moman

Published Nov 10, 2026

Last updated 1 day ago

4 minute read
People observe nature at Tynehead Regional Park Hatchery in Surrey on Nov. 9, 2026. Surrey Mayor Doug McCallum wants to pull out of Metro Vancouver except for core services (sewer, water and waste disposal). Photo by Arlen Redekop /PNG
Article content

Surrey Mayor Doug McCallum’s promise to take the city out of some regional services will likely be a complicated process and may not end up saving taxpayers much money, according to a Postmedia analysis and interviews with experts.

THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY

Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.

  • Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account.
  • Get exclusive access to the Vancouver Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on.
  • Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists.
  • Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists.
  • Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.
SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES

Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.

  • Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account.
  • Get exclusive access to the Vancouver Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on.
  • Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists.
  • Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists.
  • Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.
REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

  • Access articles from across Canada with one account.
  • Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.
  • Enjoy additional articles per month.
  • Get email updates from your favourite authors.
THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK.

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

  • Access articles from across Canada with one account
  • Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments
  • Enjoy additional articles per month
  • Get email updates from your favourite authors

Sign In or Create an Account

or View more offers

Article content

McCallum has said he wants the city to withdraw from the regional governing authority, except for certain “core services,” namely water, sewer and waste management.

Article content
Article content
Advertisement 1
Story continues below
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content

According to a Metro Vancouver fact sheet, the average homeowner in the region paid $875 for Metro services in 2025. Most of that amount — $781 — went to water, sewer and waste services. About $63 went towards maintaining regional parks, of which there are two in Surrey. Assuming Surrey residents have to continue helping pay for those parks, the average Surrey taxpayer would only save about $31 a year, based on Metro figures, which works out to $2.58 a month.

Article content
Article content

“I think that’s a very correct reading of it. I mean most of the cost is in those hard services of waste, water and sewer,” said Ken Cameron, the former head of policy and planning at the regional district.

Article content

“I think it’s not going to save very much money and I think the principle behind it all, it seems to me, is: Does the city of Surrey want to be a partner in the governance of the region?”

Article content

Cameron said if the city has issues with how the region is being run — such as how costs related to the North Shore sewage plant skyrocketed from $700 million to $3.86 billion — “the solution is to sit down around that table and figure out how to do it better, rather than picking up your marbles and going home.”

Article content
Advertisement 2
Story continues below
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content

A motion to remove Surrey from Metro Vancouver was scheduled to be voted on Monday night at the first regular council meeting since last month’s municipal elections. Also on the agenda were motions related to other promises made by McCallum during the campaign, including buying a helicopter and drone fleet to the Surrey police within the three months and committing to freezing property tax increases for four years.

Article content
Read More
  1. Advertisement 1
    Story continues below
    This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content

McCallum was not made available for an interview on Monday. Metro Vancouver did not respond to Postmedia’s request for comment before deadline.

Article content
Mayor Doug McCallum and the members of Surrey City Council officially took the Oath of Office at an inauguration ceremony held Monday, Nov. 2, 2026 at Surrey City Hall. Photo by City of Surrey /Handout
Article content

The mayor’s plan to withdraw from the regional district is not as simple as passing a motion, said UBC political scientist Stewart Prest.

Article content

“There are multiple boards across Metro Vancouver and membership is not universal. But all the major cities are on all the main boards. So for Surrey to pull out, even if it were successful in doing so, it creates a significant hole in governance of the region.”

Article content

Cameron said the process would likely be a lengthy legal one, with the city first applying to the district to seek removal of some services and passing a municipal bylaw. The province would likely need to be involved, he added.

Advertisement 1
This advertisement has not loaded yet.
Advertisement 2
Advertisement
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content

When Cameron was part of Metro Vancouver, then called Greater Vancouver Regional District, he said there was always talk about municipalities wanting to leave the regional district, but none did.

Article content

“I worked for the region for 25 years or so, and it was very much a municipal federation. This system is set up to benefit municipalities and should be amenable, particularly to the largest- or second-largest municipality. If there’s a problem with it, then they have a lot of leverage within the system to address the issues,” he said.

Article content

Andy Yan, the City program director at Simon Fraser University, also questioned whether Surrey would actually be saving money in the long-term by withdrawing from Metro.

Article content

“The thing about why you go into regional government and regional services is the fact that there are certain services and infrastructures that are actually more expensive when you do it alone,” Yan said. “The scales of economy that you can do as a region are precisely why you work as a region as opposed to an individual municipality or even or even just a smaller group of municipalities.”

Article content
Advertisement 3
Story continues below
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content

Regional governance has been in place for many decades in B.C., meaning other services, such as transportation, could also be impacted if Surrey city successfully withdraws from Metro, Yan said.

Article content

“It’s not only about Surrey by itself, but it’s about its relationships to other parts of the region, and, of course, folks will talk about Vancouver, but this also includes connections between Surrey and Richmond, Surrey and Langley,” he said.

Article content

Cameron agreed, saying the city could potentially be at risk of not receiving funding for McCallum’s plan to extend SkyTrain services to Newton.

Article content

“TransLink was set up at the behest of the regional district through negotiations between the regional district and the province, and that set up their requirements that translates to providing services within the context of regional growth management planning, air quality plans and economic development. So I think there would be a question that could be raised as to whether a particular initiative, such as a SkyTrain extension, fits within the regional growth management plan or not,” Cameron said.

Article content

With files from David Carrigg 

Article content

smoman@postmedia.com

Article content
Advertisement 2
This advertisement has not loaded yet.
Share this article in your social network

More From Vancouver Chronicles