Death of malnourished Duncan girl a ‘systemic’ failure: defence lawyer

Death of malnourished Duncan girl a ‘systemic’ failure: defence lawyer

Though the Cowichan Tribes’ child protection agency had determined the girl’s parents needed substantial monitoring of their parenting, they had minimal contact with social workers.

Author of the article:

By Roxanne Egan-Elliott  •  Victoria Times Colonist

Published Jul 06, 2026

Last updated 8 hours ago

4 minute read

You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.

Law courts in Duncan, B.C. Google streetview
Article content

The lawyer representing the father of a six-year-old girl who died in Duncan five years ago calls the child’s death a “systemic failing of epic proportions.”

THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY

Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.

  • Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account.
  • Get exclusive access to the Vancouver Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on.
  • Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists.
  • Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists.
  • Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.
SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES

Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.

  • Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account.
  • Get exclusive access to the Vancouver Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on.
  • Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists.
  • Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists.
  • Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.
REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

  • Access articles from across Canada with one account.
  • Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.
  • Enjoy additional articles per month.
  • Get email updates from your favourite authors.
THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK.

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

  • Access articles from across Canada with one account
  • Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments
  • Enjoy additional articles per month
  • Get email updates from your favourite authors

Sign In or Create an Account

or View more offers

Article content

Peter Joe and Vanessa Daniels are both charged with manslaughter in the death of their daughter Diana Daniels on April 9, 2021, from a blood clot related to malnutrition.

Article content

We apologize, but this video has failed to load.
Try refreshing your browser, or
tap here to see other videos from our team.
Death of malnourished Duncan girl a ‘systemic’ failure: defence lawyer Back to video

We apologize, but this video has failed to load.
Try refreshing your browser, or
tap here to see other videos from our team.
Article content

The Crown is arguing Joe and Daniels should be found guilty of manslaughter by criminal negligence because they failed to seek medical attention for Diana.

Article content
Article content

For the two to be found guilty, the Crown must prove that failing to seek medical attention was a marked and substantial departure from what a reasonably prudent parent would have done in the circumstances.

Article content
Article content

But Sarah Runyon, who is representing Joe, told the court Friday in her closing arguments that it’s not possible to determine what a reasonably prudent person would have done in the circumstances, because it’s not possible to know beyond a reasonable doubt how Diana’s symptoms progressed and presented.

Article content

At times, the girl had trouble walking and had swelling in a leg, but it’s not possible to know when her symptoms “fell off a cliff,” Runyon said, adding it could have been on the day she died.

Article content

Joe called 911 that evening to report that his daughter was unresponsive. She was rushed to hospital, but doctors were unable to resuscitate her.

Article content

Police, paramedics and a doctor who saw Diana the night she died testified at trial that she looked very sick, with one officer saying she looked like an end-stage cancer patient. She had lost hair on her head and had lesions on her skin and a pressure sore on her back that exposed bone.

Article content
Article content

Crown prosecutor Paul Battin said in his closing submissions that both parents knew Diana was not healthy at least a month before she died, because she did not get out of bed on her sixth birthday, despite a surprise visit from her mother, who had been in hospital in Victoria.

Article content
Read More
  1. Advertisement 1
    Story continues below
    This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content

Battin said the evidence shows Diana was on a steady decline in her final month, complaining of pain in her leg, screaming when she was picked up and needing to be pushed in a stroller.

Article content

Diana was living with her parents, toddler brother and premature newborn sister in a one-bedroom motel suite at the time of her death.

Article content

Daniels had experienced complications with her pregnancy and unexpectedly had to spend a few weeks in hospital in Victoria. She returned to Duncan about a week before Diana died, Runyon said.

Article content

In April 2021, Cowichan Tribes put its reserve on effective lockdown and issued a shelter-in-place order, she said.

Article content

As a result, despite the nation’s child protection agency determining Joe and Daniels needed substantial monitoring of their parenting, they had minimal contact with a rotating roster of social workers, Runyon said.

Advertisement 1
This advertisement has not loaded yet.
Advertisement 2
Advertisement
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content

Joe and Daniels both described each other in police statements as loving and caring parents, and referred to their daughter as “princess,” she said.

Article content

Runyon pointed to testimony by the forensic pathologist who conducted Diana’s autopsy that there was food in Diana’s stomach, indicating she was likely fed hours before she died.

Article content

When police and paramedics arrived following Joe’s 911 call, there was cooked macaroni on the stove, and the fridge was stocked with food, she said.

Article content

Joe told police that on the day she died, Diana woke up with the family, ate fruit and was bathed. She wasn’t feeling well, and her parents believed she had the flu and were treating her for it. She had Ibuprofen in her system, and there was children’s Motrin in the unit.

Article content

Joe and Daniels were arrested in January 2024, nearly three years after their daughter’s death. Joe’s interview with police makes it clear he is ­“unsophisticated,” someone who might struggle with life skills, Runyon said.

Article content

He found learning to drive overwhelming, struggles to recall phone numbers and appears to have genuine trouble with timelines, she said.

Article content
Article content

He told police Daniels stayed with someone named Janine when she was in Victoria giving birth to their youngest child, but she was actually staying at Jeneece Place, temporary housing on the grounds of Victoria General Hospital where families can stay while receiving medical care, Runyon said.

Article content

The nation’s child protection agency was involved in monitoring the family, but refused to provide any of its communications to the court, said lawyer Scott Sheets, who is representing Daniels.

Article content

Someone from the agency was at the motel on April 1, a little more than a week before Diana died, he said.

Article content

A search of the motel unit showed it was filled with toys, electronics and stuffed animals, Sheets said.

Article content

“Everything in the apartment speaks of caring for the children,” he said.

Article content

The parents’ two other ­children were taken from their custody after Diana’s death and returned to them after a child protection hearing, Sheets said. The children were removed again when the Crown decided to lay charges in 2024, he said.

Article content

The trial, which lasted two weeks, concluded on Friday. Justice Robin Baird, who is presiding over the judge-alone trial, will give his verdict at a later date.

Article content
Share this article in your social network

More From Vancouver Chronicles